A Special Invitation from Chelsea* to Drogba…
How’s life in China? How’s the food? The weather? How’s your Chinese coming along? Hope all is well.
Here’s the deal, Didier, we miss you at Stamford Bridge. We really need you to come back. Like this week. I know we parted ways on great terms, with you having just won the Champions League for us and all. If you were going to leave the club, it was the perfect time to do so. We were all very understanding, but let’s face it, our Champions League-winning high clouded our judgment. Now that we’ve had time to ponder… we think we made a big mistake.
Did you see our draw today against a very beatable Liverpool? Their striker Suarez saved the day for them again – a lot like you used to for Chelsea. We need a big time lethal striker again. That’s where you come in. We’ve got some great new guys this season we think you’ll really dig – guys like Hazard and Oscar. They’ve been creating great ball movement with Mata, but the problem is they need a real strongman in the box to feed the ball to. No one wreaks havoc in the box like you do. We really miss your ability to hold the ball and invent crazy-angled shots out of nothing. In case you’re wondering about Torres, well, we’re not exactly sure what to do about that yet. But it probably involves selling him for as much cash as possible come January. Look, Fernando’s a great guy and we wish him well, but he’s no Drogba.
Now we know you left Chelsea primarily because Shanghai-whatchamacallit offered you a bazillion dollars. Very understandable. We didn’t think we could match their bazillions. But this week we found out we actually made a profit for the first time in something like a decade (thanks to the Champions League riches you helped us get), so, since we’re not used to operating in the black anyway, we thought we’d just give you all that excess profit if you come back.
By the way, in case it’s not all about money, you saw where Chelsea fans recently voted you one of the greatest Blues players in club history, right? That’s pretty sweet. The fans would welcome you back in a heartbeat. Just sayin’. We know you have a soft spot for Chelsea in that lion heart of yours, so we want to remind you that John Terry got knocked out of the Liverpool match today with a potentially season-ending injury, Lampard is still out with a calf thing, and we loaned Michael Essien to Real Madrid for reasons we’re still not entirely sure about (okay, we brought that last one on ourselves, but we’re just pointing out the dearth of Blues vets currently on hand).
Just in case you feel a little weird about the idea of coming back to Chelsea so soon after leaving, it’s not unprecedented. Paul Scholes returned to Man U after retiring for a while last season. Thierry Henry even went back to Arsenal on loan earlier this year. It’s obviously not our first choice, but we’d settle for you returning to Chelsea on loan whenever the Chinese league’s over (sorry, we’re not sure when their season ends – until you went there we didn’t even know China had a pro league). Whatever it takes, Didier, that’s what we’re saying.
Admit it, you miss the Premier League. The high-pressure matches. The packed, historic stadiums. Cup finals. Champions League nights around Europe. Eccentric gazillionaire Russian owners. Causing Sir Alex heartburn. Democracy.
We don’t want to pressure you too much, but we have slipped from first to third in the table within a couple weeks, so we kind of need an answer ASAP. Only you can help prevent one of the Manchesters winning the league again. Chelsea’s fate is in your hands. Okay, that may be overstating it a bit, but come on man you’re playing in China for goodness sakes! No one watches Chinese soccer!
Come home, Didier, come home. You know you want to. We can have a jet there in a matter of hours.
Chelsea Football Club
P.S. Say hello to Anelka for us.
*Unfortunately this letter does not represent an actual invitation from Chelsea Football Club to Didier Drogba.
Why I’m rooting for France in Euro 2012
A lot of people don’t like France. Or maybe it’s French folks they dislike. And I can understand that a little. They can be culturally snooty sometimes; though so can pretty much every other nationality on earth. And from a soccer standpoint I can understand why people wouldn’t like the French national team seeing as two of the most infamous meltdowns in World Cup history were perpetrated by les Bleus. There was Zinedine Zidane’s head butt of Italy’s Marco Materazzi that may have cost France the World Cup title in 2006. Then there was the undetected hand-ball by Thierry Henry that unfairly sent France instead of Ireland to World Cup 2010 in South Africa. The team imploded in South Africa, with coach Raymond Domenech kicking Nicolas Anelka off the team and the rest of the squad refusing to practice at one point in protest.
Particularly after the World Cup 2010 incident, the French team gained the reputation (whether accurate or not) as selfish mega-stars that cared more about themselves than representing their country honorably. Since then, the French Football Federation wisely dumped strange Coach Domenech and hired Laurent Blanc, an alum from the World Cup ’98 winning French side. Blanc has successfully overhauled the French squad, giving new youngsters a chance while reincorporating the megastars. France has plenty of megastars by the way, including Benzema, Ribery, Nasri, Malouda, and Ben Arfa.
So why in the world would I root for France in the Euros this summer? It’s a personal connection. I lived in France for nine months when I was eleven-years-old. Nine months can make a big impression at any age, but especially when you’re eleven. I really liked soccer before we moved to France, but I really loved soccer within a couple weeks of living in France. It was very contagious. I was playing pick-up games with neighborhood kids the first day I was there! Couldn’t understand a word they were saying at that point, but soccer bridged the gaps. And the soccer never relented the whole time I was there.
Since I attended a French public school in Tours, France, I was naturally influenced by their player and team preferences, which of course included the French national team. Euro ’88 was my first European Championship experience. I was hooked. I ended up cheering on Holland because I liked Ruud Gullit and because France hadn’t qualified. The French weren’t too happy about that, particularly since they’d won the title in 1984. I’ve rooted for France ever since my time living there, with a couple of exceptions – if they’re playing the U.S. obviously, and at the 2002 World Cup I cheered for Senegal over France because I also lived in Senegal for five years. But that’s another story.
When it comes to the Euros, I love watching the tournament, but the fun is enhanced when you have a team to cheer on. France has their issues, but I’m sticking with them. Not because of particular players, but because when I watch them, I remember the faces of all the French classmates I ran with at school and on the playground, whose exuberance for les Bleus and football itself had an effect on me that has never quite faded.
(France plays their opening game of Euro 2012 against England on Monday, June 11, at 11:00 AM (Central) on ESPN)
Who will you root for in Euro 2012?
Chelsea enjoys 3 – 1 victory over Everton
It was good to see the Blues back in action after the lengthy international break. I’m not much of a fan of the international breaks by the way. I understand their necessity and I don’t have a better solution to offer, but I’d rather not have them interrupting the season.
Chelsea put in an excellent performance against Everton yesterday. It was a mostly comfortable victory – one that actually reminded me of the ‘09/10 EPL title winning Blues. This season’s Sunderland, Bolton, and Everton wins are reminiscent of Chelsea’s more dominant phases of the past several years. Things are looking up. If only they hadn’t let Man U get the better of them!
Conceding a late goal to Everton slightly marred the day. Defensively, sometimes it’s easy to be lulled into a false sense of security with a three-goal lead, but Chelsea really needs to seal those leaks in preparation for tougher days ahead. Petr Cech must be banging his padded noggin against his locker lamenting the lack of clean sheets this season.
One major confidence booster for Chelsea and its fans is the current lineup depth. It sure is heartening to see the likes of Malouda and Anelka warming up as substitutes! It’s an embarrassment of riches really. I think Chelsea has the best depth in the league right now. Look at the guys who weren’t playing yesterday: Torres, Luiz, Alex, Meireles, Lukaku. The TV cameras even gave us a glimpse of Michael Essien in the stands, still out with his knee injury. Here’s hoping Essien can rejoin the squad for the second half of the season!
Other thoughts from the game…
Bosingwa has surprised and impressed me this year. He has been quite a reliable right back from preseason on. However, if I’m being picky, his crosses into the box, or pass selection at the end of positive runs down the wing, are often hasty and sloppy.
Hope Ramires’ knee injury suffered when netting Chelsea’s third goal just turns out to be a knock. He has been Chelsea’s Energizer bunny this season and would be missed if he has to sit out long. Ramires could turn into a long-term star for Chelsea.Juan Mata is looking like a genius signing thus far. He is all over the field, offensively innovative, with great passing and deft ball handling.
Likewise, Daniel Sturridge continues to impress. Chelsea needs to wrap him up with a long-term contract.
Drogba had a bit of an off day, but he’ll come around. He was still involved through his strong physical presence and made several key passes. I still think he should start alongside Torres once Fernando returns from his three-match red card ban.
It was a good weekend for Chelsea fans and a positive primer for Wednesday’s Champions League match against Genk!
Thoughts on Chelsea’s performance against Everton? Feel free to share below…
Blues dominate at Sunderland
The big news before today’s match was that Torres would start… on the bench. Word is that AVB ain’t all that thrilled that Nando left his magic scoring boots in Liverpool.
On the good news front for Chelsea: Cech was back in goal today. It was also great to see David Luiz again, even if it was just on the bench.
Overall, a rather un-dramatic match today. It was pretty much a walk in the park for the Blues. But after the last couple nail-biters, this Chelsea fan welcomed the break. Here are a few of my game notes:
-Early on, some classic Cole runs up the left wing from the back. Ashley Cole is an unsung workhorse for Chelsea. He’s so reliable in his position that it’s easy to take him for granted.
-11th min: Mata made a great run into the box, but Anelka couldn’t do anything with Mata’s cutback pass. In fact, Anelka was virtually absent for the first 10 minutes.
-18th min: Fantastic finish by Terry for a Chelsea goal! And nice cross from Sturridge to kick off the frantic sequence in the box, which led to the goal.
-First quarter of the game was nothing for Chelsea to write home about. Not bad, but nothing flashy. Expected a little more precise possession. Apparently they’re still working out the kinks with new players in the lineup.
-Mata was a very bright spot for Chelsea in the first half hour. Always moving, trying to make things happen. Some smart and spot-on passes from him.
-Sturridge was energetic, trying hard to get involved, though he missed a great low-level cross from Bosingwa in the 37th minute.
-By the end of the first half the game was very casual with Sunderland content to let Chelsea bring the ball forward.
-51st min: Great 40-yard pass from Anelka to Sturridge who then cleverly back heeled the ball into the goal!
-63rd min: Awesome on-goal half volley from Malouda (in his very first touch of the game), but it was saved by Sunderland’s keeper.
-75th min: Torres replaced Mata. Probably a well-timed choice by AVB to get Torres into a low-pressure situation. Unfortunately, Torres barely touched the ball.
-79th min: Oriol Romeu made his Chelsea debut, replacing Anelka for the game’s home stretch. He didn’t see the ball enough to make much of an impression.
-91st min: Chelsea allowed a very disappointing Sunderland goal to make it 2 – 1.
-94th min: Scariest minute of the game as Sunderland suddenly sprang to life, launching several balls into the Chelsea box. Chelsea had a sudden 3-on-1 offensive situation after Cech launched the ball downfield out of danger. Torres received it and had a wide-open Ramires to his right, but made an absolutely dreadful waste of a pass that went out of bounds. Fortunately for him, the game was over seconds later!
So, a solid win for Chelsea, even though it wasn’t the kind of commanding victory that the Manchesters have produced. After Man U thrashed Bolton today, I’m leery of the Blues’ trip to Old Trafford next weekend. Before psyching themselves up for that one, Chelsea turn their attention to Bayer Leverkusen in Champions League play on Tuesday. Things are about to get interesting!
What did you think about Chelsea’s performance against Sunderland? How will Chelsea fare against Bayer and Manchester United next week?
Blues win Barclay’s Asia Trophy with 2 – 0 victory over Aston Villa
1st Half Highlights/Commentary
-1st min: Amazing start for Chelsea… Bosingwa made a great leading pass to Anelka who raced into the box and shot, but was blocked by Villa GK Shea Given. Ball deflected to Malouda who shot, but Given saved it again. This time McEachran slammed the rebound into the net!
-Aside from the obvious early goal, Chelsea began the game very strong, perhaps even stronger than the Kitchee game. The passing was precise and had a quicker tempo than we saw in the first two Asian games.
-Competition for starting forward spots seems to have inspired everyone to step up their game this preseason (except Torres – yet). Anelka and Sturridge had a sharp first half against Aston Villa, both carrying the ball confidently into space.
-Commentator Martin Tyler again talked about the “ageing” Chelsea stars. The problem in bringing this up so often during this preseason is that age doesn’t appear to be a factor for Chelsea yet. Next year, or two seasons down the road, it will probably be something to talk about. But right now you can’t say Terry, Lampard, Malouda, Anelka, or Drogba are struggling because of their age.
-Good to see Chelsea dominate a Premier League side, looking very comfortable in the first half. Minor quibble with the fact that Chelsea’s scoring threats dried up in the last 20 minutes of the half.
2nd Half Highlights/Commentary
-Great to see Alex on for the first time this preseason! He replaced Ivanovic to start the second half.
-55th min: Fantastic dribble run at the top of the box by Sturridge, who slid it to Malouda on the left. Malouda made an excellent cross to Lampard who headed it on goal. Given made a diving save, deflecting it out to Sturridge who blasted it over the goal. Great sequence, though Lampard and Sturridge should’ve scored.
-57th min: Van Aanholt on for Zhirkov, Torres on for Sturridge, and Drogba on for McEachran.
-58th min: Shocker – Torres’ first touch of the game is a goal! Malouda took an overly ambitious long-range shot, which Torres calmly glanced on the run and into the goal. 2 – 0 for Chelsea.
-72nd min: Benayoun replaced Anelka. Anelka had the best game I’ve seen him play in quite some time.
-Chelsea wasn’t able to get Drogba involved at all in the second half. Perhaps it was just too crowded up top with Anelka, Drogba, and Torres in at the same time. Great to have a hungry offense – they’ve just got to figure out how to share the creative space.
-84th min: Kalou came on for Lampard. Chalobah entered for Terry in the 89th minute.
-Overall, Chelsea worked hard, demonstrating very positive progress from the earlier games of their Asia tour. Chelsea looks confident and fans have adequate reason for optimism about the season’s start in two weeks!
What positives/negatives did you notice from Chelsea against Villa?
Blues look a little better in 4 – 0 win
1st Half Highlights/Commentary
-First 10 minutes were once again sluggish for Chelsea. They were firmly in control of possession, but the build-up was slow, with no real speed in the final third.
-17th min: Some good action from the forwards for a change. First Sturridge sent a floating cross from the left, Torres settled it, tried to move into the box, but cut it back to Anelka who got a shot off at the top of the box, but it was snuffed out.
-Anelka found a lot of space in the first 20 minutes, but his shots and passes weren’t sharp enough.
-32nd min: Best shot of the game so far was by one of the Thai all-stars. Cech had to make a good save.
-34th min: Three Chelsea players (Anelka, Torres, Van Aanholt) touched the ball in the box but couldn’t get a shot on goal!
-37th min: Van Aanholt made a great pass into the box to Torres who made a very poor left-footed shot across the goal that missed wide right.
-37th min: Fortunately for Chelsea, Lampard took one of his classic worm-burner shots from the top of the box to score (Anelka set up Lampard with a short pass).
-First half negatives: Corner kick finishing was dreadful. Chelsea did not seem interested in connecting via headers or otherwise. The corners were simply wasted.
Torres and Sturridge found some decent openings, but their finishing shots were sorely lacking. Don’t mean to pick on Torres too much, but when is he going to get it in gear? He is not a threat to opposing defenses at all. He is slow, sloppy, seems to give up easily on the ball, and his shots are either too soft or not even on frame.
-First half positives: McEachran had excellent ball control and impeccable passing. The Chelsea defense handled the few Thai challenges with poise. Anelka was more involved with the action than he was against Malaysia XI. Van Aanholt continuously made contributing runs down the left flank, working several connecting passes into the box.
2nd Half Highlights/Commentary
-The only change for Chelsea to start the second half was Hilario taking over for Cech in goal.
-49th min: Bosingwa sent in a cross that looked disappointing because it was too close to goal, but the Thai GK appeared to misjudge the ball’s flight and knocked it into the goal… 2 – 0 for Chelsea.
-51st min: Great sequence from Ivanovic starting the ball forward from the back, played a give-and-go to McEachran, then Ivanovic found himself one v. one with the GK and slid it in to make it 3 – 0 for Chelsea.
-61st min: Drogba, Malouda, Benayoun, Ferreira, Zhirkov, Cole, Kalou, and Rajkovic entered the game.
-72nd min: Malouda ran onto an excellent through-ball from Cole and Malouda scored to make it 4-0.
-76th min: Jamal Blackman took over for Hilario in goal. Chalobah replaced Ivanovic.
-Second half negatives: Chelsea’s possession was more sporadic than in the first half. The defense was a little leaky, allowing several dangerous Thai shots.
-Second half positives: Though the Chelsea attack wasn’t particularly cohesive, they were much better at finding openings and finishing in the final third. Villas-Boas talked about wanting to see more “vertical” passing after the Malaysia game and Chelsea finally achieved more successful vertical balls today.
Also, Hilario was fantastic in goal. I have not been impressed in the past by Hilario’s play (in the very few appearances he’s made), but he looked world class today.
Summary: It was great to see so many goals, however, the score doesn’t actually reflect much Chelsea improvement over the Malaysia game. There was still a painful lack of urgency from the Blues in the first half and a very casual pace in the second. However, Chelsea was much better at creating space and scoring opportunities than in their last outing. Hopefully, the team will continue looking sharper as they move camp to Hong Kong.
Do you think Chelsea played better today than against Malaysia XI?
1-0 Chelsea win leaves much to be desired from Blues
1st Half Highlights (or lowlights)/Commentary
-Good to see Bertrand and McEachran in the starting eleven.
-Chelsea played a 4-3-3 formation as preferred by Andre Villas-Boas at Porto.
-I’m unfamiliar with Slobodan Rajkovic in the back line (22-year-old). Apparently he has European work permit issues so he’s getting a look during the Asia tour.
-2nd min: Benayoun took a giveaway and gave great through-ball to Torres who slid a grounder right to the goalie. Torres should’ve finished the golden opportunity.
-First third of the game was very sluggish possession-wise for Chelsea. 67 passes in first 12 minutes or so, but in small spurts, often broken up, with very little flow and only a couple chances from Benayoun passes.
-I’d like to see a little more aggressiveness and snap. Manchester United and Real Madrid look sharper and hungrier for goals in their recent U.S. friendlies.
-17th min: Bertrand hit cross from left that was mis-cleared, Kalou tapped it to Lampard who missed the goal badly.
-19th min: Excellent through-ball from Kalou to Torres who couldn’t toe it in from a tough angle.
-Through first 20 minutes, Chelsea defense looked very calm and composed. No real threats from Malaysia XI.
-Some impressive work from Bertrand passing and dribbling down left side.
-29th min: Lampard free kick right on edge of box, but he smashed it off Malouda and out of play.
-Torres was static off the ball for much of the half. Not encouraging.
-Chelsea looked pretty sloppy in the final third, which was a problem for much of last season.
-36th min: Bosingwa threw an unusual mini-tantrum, throwing the ball away when he disagreed with a throw-in call. A few minutes later Kalou protested when he was called for a clear hand-ball. Both cases showed poor sportsmanship/professionalism from Chelsea, particularly for a friendly! They should know better.
-37th min: Patrick Van Aanholt replaced Bertrand at left back. Not sure if it was planned, or if Bertrand was gassed. Surprising move because Bertrand looked strong and confident.
-39th min: Torres made one good move past a defender inside the left side of the box to get a shot off, but once again from a bad angle.
-With 40 minutes gone, one of the game commentators remarked that, “…preseason or not, [he is] exceptionally underwhelmed by Chelsea. No real movement. No real desire.” I couldn’t have agreed with him more!
-42nd min: Lampard missed another chance in the box, right in front of goal, after a quick succession of nice passes (though he looked to be barely offside anyway).
-45th min: Great cross from Bosingwa but Torres barely missed getting his head on it and Benayoun’s resulting clean-up shot was blocked by a defender.
Summary: While you can’t read too much into preseason matches, this was a very disappointing start from Chelsea. You would expect that competition for playing spots would inspire more aggressiveness and spark from players trying to impress the manager. Alas, there was very little energy or zip from the squad in the first half with the exceptions of Benayoun and Bertrand.
-An entirely new eleven started the second half.
-47th min: Mikel made the kind of quality long-range shot that was missing in the first half.
-First 10 minutes of the second half Chelsea showed a bit more desire, but not many scoring chances to show for it.
-60th min: Good initiative by Terry, taking a ball at midfield and rushing it forward. Nice leading pass to Anelka who passed it back toward the middle, but a defender cleared it out.
-20 minutes into the second half I was getting restless. It seemed every Chelsea pass was just out of reach, or intercepted, or headed away. Far too many long balls. Little build-up passing. The initial hope brought on by the second half eleven began to fade.
-69th min: Zhirkov free kick found Terry’s head but it went a couple feet over the crossbar. At least Terry was showing some leadership with his aggressiveness.
-70th min: Sturridge ran onto a ball, took it into the box and hit a nice low shot, but the GK made a great save.
-As usual, Drogba worked much harder off the ball than Torres. He makes things happen. He’s a troublemaker for defenses. Hopefully Torres will learn from Drogba’s wily ways!
-78th min: Drogba free kick outside left side of the box was a screamer that the goalkeeper barely got a hand on. The ball bounced off the post, off the GK’s back, bounced on the line, and was ruled a goal by the linesman. Replays clearly showed the ball did not cross the line.
-85th min: Malaysia missed an easy goal after an unusual lapse in the middle of the Chelsea defense.
-Billy Clifford (midfielder), Mikel, and Anelka were invisible for the last 20 minutes. Not good.
Summary: With the Blues players only having to play one half, we should have seen much more hustle and desire. Yes it’s only preseason, but Malaysia is a team that lost to Liverpool 6-3 just last week. That’s the kind of dominating result you want to encourage and reward a team for training hard in preseason. You want to blaze through these tune-up games, build confidence, and peak in time for the EPL season premier against Stoke.
Overall, absolutely not the energetic, goal-blitz I was looking for from Chelsea. It was a lackadaisical effort that brought back bad memories of last season. Andre Villas-Boas couldn’t have been impressed. Hopefully he’ll light a fire under the team before the next match in Thailand on Sunday!
How do you think Chelsea played today?
This week’s transfer rumors and signing realities
I’ve followed the daily transfer rumors more closely this summer than I have in past years and it has been quite amusing. The latest example being Sir Alex Ferguson’s denial that Manchester United are deal-making to acquire Wesley Sneijder from Inter Milan. It was a pretty firm denial in the face of supposedly serious reports all week that a deal is imminent. The moral of the story is you don’t really know what’s going on with a player during transfer season until they show up in a new uniform.
I’ve kept tabs on the transfer rumors just to keep up with which Chelsea players are coming and going. Of course, all the attention has been on Chelsea’s attempt to get Modric from Tottenham. That deal is apparently deader than it’s been all summer after Tottenham nixed two Chelsea offers and denied Modric’s transfer request. This mini-circus will likely continue until the season starts and I wouldn’t be surprised if Modric ends up in a Chelsea uniform during the January transfer window.
I think Chelsea should abandon the Modric pursuit in favor of another of this week’s rumors: trying to get Scott Parker on loan from West Ham. The times I’ve seen Parker play the past couple seasons, he has displayed the kind of relentless hustle and passion that was missing from much of the Chelsea squad last year. Because of his age, he may not be a long-term addition, but if one of the primary personnel needs at the moment is a replacement for Essien at midfield, Parker could be just the shot in the arm the team needs. Currently Aston Villa seems to be the frontrunner to acquire Parker’s services.
The other prominent transfer rumor of the week was Chelsea’s pursuit of Bolton defender Gary Cahill. Interesting, though Chelsea’s defense seems to be in pretty good shape right now. If this deal happened, I can’t see Cahill starting over any of the current group very often.
Other quieter rumors this week include Nicolas Anelka possibly returning to Paris St. Germain and Alex maybe heading to Bayern Munich or Real Madrid. I like both players a lot, but of the two, transferring Anelka might be the shrewder move because of his age (32) and the fact that things are a little crowded at the Chelsea forward position. It’s time for Daniel Sturridge to see more minutes at forward and transferring Anelka would help facilitate that.
I would hate to see Alex go. When all the Chelsea defenders are healthy, they have a deep, quality bench, which is vital to the long EPL season. If Alex left, adding someone like a Gary Cahill would be essential to maintaining that bench depth. Anelka played in the second half of Chelsea’s first preseason game against Wycombe Wanderers Tuesday, but Alex did not.
Finally, two young Blues received welcome contract extensions today. Twenty-two-year-old left-back Ryan Bertrand signed a four-year deal. Eighteen-year-old midfielder Josh McEachran signed a five-year-deal. Both signings seem very promising, though I only saw Bertrand for a few minutes in one game last season, so I don’t know much about him yet. The McEachran signing is great for Chelsea. Ancelotti worked him into several games last season and despite his beanpole build, McEachran was extremely impressive with his poise, patience, placement, and passing prowess (I got on a roll with the p’s and had to keep it going). If McEachran can avoid burnout and develop some upper body bulk, he could very well be Chelsea’s Lampard of the future.
Which of these Chelsea transfer rumors is most exciting? Most disappointing?