Chelsea unveils 3rd kit
Chelsea trained in Miami for the first time yesterday evening in preparation for their final U.S. preseason game against A.C. Milan Saturday night. The Blues will undoubtedly be antsy for a win after tying Paris St. Germain in New York and losing to the MLS All-Stars in Philadelphia. Should be a fun one against A.C. Milan.
Yesterday Chelsea unveiled the all-important (not really) “third” kit – an interesting yellow and black number inspired either by Tron or 80s big-hair metal band Stryper. I’m not sure which…
I’m not a big fan of this 3rd kit, though there are far worse jerseys to be featured in the Premier League this season (for proof check out this and especially this). Chelsea has also had worse 3rd kits in the past, although I liked last season’s 3rd (which has sentimental value as the kit worn in that historic win at Barcelona to reach the Champions League final). Generally, I prefer jerseys that aren’t too busy, and this new kit has a little too much going on for my taste (particularly those ab-highlighting lines). But the 3rd is usually just a cameo jersey, so we probably won’t see it very often.
As a side note, Chelsea wore their new away kit for the first time against the MLS All-Stars the other night and I thought it worked well. The previously bashed sash on the jersey didn’t bother me that much.
Some Blues-related news I’ve seen today includes Benayoun possibly being loaned to Fulham, and Marseille possibly selling defender Cesar Azpilicueta to Chelsea. I like Benayoun, but at 32-years-old, I don’t expect Chelsea will keep him this season. Fulham would probably be a good gig for Benayoun. As for Azpilicueta, I don’t remember much about him from watching Marseille in the Champions League last season, but I welcome the signing of another defender.
What do you think of Chelsea’s new 3rd kit?
Chelsea’s new away kit is pretty cool except…
Chelsea recently released their new away kit for the 2012/13 season. The Adidas duds are primarily white and classy overall – until you get to that baby blue sash. The sash… arrrrgh! It’s so overrated and overused in world soccer at the moment. Nike used it pretty effectively for the U.S. national team at the 2010 World Cup in a nice nod to the 1950 U.S. World Cup squad who pulled off that famous upset of England. But the last couple years have seen an outbreak of frequently hideous sashes (exhibit A in the hideous department is Sweden’s current away jersey, which resembles a road sign). And now the sash has infected Chelsea.
The new Chelsea away kit is almost an instant classic with its uncluttered, clean look, and tasteful Adidas shoulder stripes. Many soccer fans hate all white uniforms, but I’ve always liked them. The plainer white the kit, the better as far as I’m concerned. But then they have to go and add that diagonal sash. To be fair, the Chelsea sash isn’t a disaster as sashes go. It’s simply unnecessary to the uniform. Sorry to be such a sash basher, but they always remind me of beauty pageant contestants and dictators.
I also think if you’re going with a mostly white uniform, you need to complete the ensemble with white socks. But this getup’s socks are black. Oh well. It could be worse. I do like that they went with different shades of blue rather than off-the-wall colors that are totally unrelated to the club’s core colors. Overall, it’s a mixed review. Certainly not bad, but I’m not going to rush out and get this one. Blame the sash.
What do you think of Chelsea’s new away kit?