Sad thoughts on my favorite player being loaned to Real Madrid
So how ‘bout that UEFA Super Cup, huh? Yeah. Less said about that one the better. Let’s just chalk it up to one of those days when the whole squad wakes up and forgets to play soccer in the actual soccer match. Fortunately for Chelsea, it was a meaningless UEFA money-grubbing match. I’ve never watched the Super Cup before and only tuned in this time because Chelsea was playing. Well, sort of. Atletico Madrid was playing; Chelsea was mostly watching Falcao score goals.
Meanwhile, I was completely distracted by the Friday transfer window deadline rumor that my favorite Chelsea player, Michael Essien, was about to be loaned to Real Madrid for the season. Unfortunately it wasn’t just a rumor. Essien is now on his way to play for his former coach Jose Mourinho. I understand the business realities of big time soccer, but I am bitterly disappointed that Chelsea let Essien go.
Essien has been a favorite of Blues fans since Mourinho brought him to Chelsea from Lyon in 2005. He was a vital component of Chelsea’s Premier League Championship winning teams of 2005/2006 and 2009/2010. In pro sports it’s annoying how quickly pundits and club leadership tend to prematurely write off players. I don’t feel like Essien has been given a fair (and well deserved) chance to earn back his regular starting spot since returning this past January from the second serious knee injury of his career. I like Roberto Di Matteo, but my only major beef with his decision-making since he became Chelsea manager last spring has been his preference for Mikel over Essien. I like Mikel, but Essien at full fitness is a better player. Essien looked fantastic in the MLS All-Star game this summer. I was really looking forward to seeing his first full season since the 2008/2009 campaign. Now I feel cheated since he’s been available but rarely used during his last several months in a Chelsea uniform.
I’m not really sure what Chelsea is saying with this loan. It’s a frustrating tease for Essien fans, because the club is leaving the door open for his possible return, but with so many new youngsters, that seems unlikely. My prediction is that he’ll become the old Essien under Mourinho and kick some major tail in Madrid. Come January, Mourinho will probably snap him up on a permanent basis. Meanwhile Chelsea will still be wasting minutes on Raul Meireles. It would make more sense for Chelsea to loan out someone like the 19-year-old Oscar, and get another solid 4-5 years out of Essien (he is still just 29 after all).
I’ve had an uneasy feeling for a long time that something like this might happen to Essien. The only move away from Chelsea I’d ever be excited about is if he showed up on my doorstep as an FC Dallas Designated Player. But that’s never going to happen. First Drogba, now Essien. It seems the Chelsea brass are conspiring to ship out all my favorite Blues. Who’s next? Lampard?
Chelsea has a good team this season. They would have a better one if Michael Essien were in the lineup.
Sad about Michael Essien’s departure? Feel free to share your cathartic thoughts below…
Chelsea starts season off right with 2-0 defeat of Wigan
Chelsea blasted out of the gate today, with Ivanovic and Lampard scoring within the first six minutes at Wigan Athletic. Only problem with such a start was that Chelsea lacked zip for most of the remaining 84 minutes. In case you missed it, here is the good, bad, and ugly from Chelsea’s first win of the season…
Good: Eden Hazard! He showed great bursts of speed and accurate attacking passes. He was fouled a lot in the first half, which meant he was doing a lot of things right. Fox Soccer’s Warren Barton said Hazard might be the bargain of the season. I’m inclined to agree. Hazard adds zest to Chelsea’s midfield, which too often moved in slow-motion last season.
It was good to see Oscar (the brand new Brazilian signing) get some second half minutes, though I wish he wouldn’t have replaced Hazard. Oscar didn’t get to do much, but he’s only been with the team a week so we’ll cut him plenty of slack.
It was an interesting (and surprising) idea to let Ryan Bertrand try forward today. Bertrand didn’t make much impact though. In fact, he’s been more of an attacking threat in previous matches when he’s carrying the ball up the left flank as a defender. Anyway, it will be interesting to see where this experiment leads.
Bad: After Chelsea’s explosive start to the match, they allowed Wigan to have most of the possession. You can often get away with that against the Wigans of the league, except there aren’t many Wigans in the league anymore. Chelsea was fortunate that Wigan was asleep for the first five minutes of the match; otherwise we might be talking about a season-opening draw.
Torres was not involved enough (as usual). In his defense, he wasn’t provided many passes, but the ones he got he generally squandered. His best scoring chance was cleared off the line in the second half. He also missed a nifty pass in the box from Ivanovic just before full time that he should’ve been looking out for. This wasn’t the confidence-boosting outing Torres needed to start the season.
This isn’t necessarily in the “bad” category, but I was disappointed to see Mikel get the starting nod over Essien in the defensive midfield role. Di Matteo seems to favor Mikel and I’m not sure why. Mikel hasn’t been bad, but I thought Essien had a better preseason in the U.S. Tour matches. I hope today’s benching isn’t a hint that Essien’s about to be let go.
Ugly: Chelsea’s yellow/black third kit. I’m not very fashion forward (my daughter is happy to confirm this), but the third kit just doesn’t work for me. I prefer away kits to at least hint at the club’s main colors. Black & yellow isn’t Chelsea at all.
Overall, this wasn’t the dominating win it should have been. Chelsea let Wigan hang around and threaten. But in the round robin format of the Premier League, the three points is all that matters. It will take a while for Di Matteo to work out the best starting lineup combination, but the pieces are in place to have a very successful season.
What did you think of Chelsea’s season-opening performance?