Monthly Archives: July 2011
Blues win Barclay’s Asia Trophy with 2 – 0 victory over Aston Villa
1st Half Highlights/Commentary
-1st min: Amazing start for Chelsea… Bosingwa made a great leading pass to Anelka who raced into the box and shot, but was blocked by Villa GK Shea Given. Ball deflected to Malouda who shot, but Given saved it again. This time McEachran slammed the rebound into the net!
-Aside from the obvious early goal, Chelsea began the game very strong, perhaps even stronger than the Kitchee game. The passing was precise and had a quicker tempo than we saw in the first two Asian games.
-Competition for starting forward spots seems to have inspired everyone to step up their game this preseason (except Torres – yet). Anelka and Sturridge had a sharp first half against Aston Villa, both carrying the ball confidently into space.
-Commentator Martin Tyler again talked about the “ageing” Chelsea stars. The problem in bringing this up so often during this preseason is that age doesn’t appear to be a factor for Chelsea yet. Next year, or two seasons down the road, it will probably be something to talk about. But right now you can’t say Terry, Lampard, Malouda, Anelka, or Drogba are struggling because of their age.
-Good to see Chelsea dominate a Premier League side, looking very comfortable in the first half. Minor quibble with the fact that Chelsea’s scoring threats dried up in the last 20 minutes of the half.
2nd Half Highlights/Commentary
-Great to see Alex on for the first time this preseason! He replaced Ivanovic to start the second half.
-55th min: Fantastic dribble run at the top of the box by Sturridge, who slid it to Malouda on the left. Malouda made an excellent cross to Lampard who headed it on goal. Given made a diving save, deflecting it out to Sturridge who blasted it over the goal. Great sequence, though Lampard and Sturridge should’ve scored.
-57th min: Van Aanholt on for Zhirkov, Torres on for Sturridge, and Drogba on for McEachran.
-58th min: Shocker – Torres’ first touch of the game is a goal! Malouda took an overly ambitious long-range shot, which Torres calmly glanced on the run and into the goal. 2 – 0 for Chelsea.
-72nd min: Benayoun replaced Anelka. Anelka had the best game I’ve seen him play in quite some time.
-Chelsea wasn’t able to get Drogba involved at all in the second half. Perhaps it was just too crowded up top with Anelka, Drogba, and Torres in at the same time. Great to have a hungry offense – they’ve just got to figure out how to share the creative space.
-84th min: Kalou came on for Lampard. Chalobah entered for Terry in the 89th minute.
-Overall, Chelsea worked hard, demonstrating very positive progress from the earlier games of their Asia tour. Chelsea looks confident and fans have adequate reason for optimism about the season’s start in two weeks!
What positives/negatives did you notice from Chelsea against Villa?
New era for U.S. men’s national team
As I’ve mentioned in this digital space before, I like Bob Bradley. I didn’t like him at first. As the post-World Cup ’06 rumors swirled that the U.S. might pursue Jurgen Klinsmann, I was all for the idea. When that didn’t pan out and Bradley became coach, I was discouraged. It seemed an opportunity to progress had been wasted. However, Bradley grew on me, and I appreciate the job he did. Even if we should have gone further in World Cup ’10, it was still a thrilling experience (as was the Confederations Cup in ’09). So there are no hard feelings toward Bob. It was simply time for a change and I’m very glad that change is Klinsmann.
U.S. Soccer needed to shake things up and it seems they have. To beat the world at its own game, we needed someone from outside our borders, someone untainted by the inferiority complex of American soccer, someone with a completely different perspective who will hopefully be able to put their finger on what we need to do better. Klinsmann has his work cut out for him, but I’m excited about his potential.
U.S. Soccer (and fans) now must be patient with Klinsmann. He’s not going to work overnight miracles. Players still have to win the games. I wouldn’t expect big things from the friendlies in August and September. But if U.S. Soccer has patience – and if Klinsmann is willing to hang in there – he could be the right guy to guide the team to the next level.
Life is funny. I remember watching Klinsmann in the 1990 and ’94 World Cups. He was a wiry, fiery competitor for Germany. Who would have imagined then that this German hero would someday coach the United States national team? Pretty cool. Very few of the world’s current national team coaches have actually won the World Cup (as a coach or player). Now ours has. Perhaps it’s the edge we’ve been missing.
What are your thoughts about Klinsmann coaching the U.S.?
FCD defeats Alianza FC 1 – 0 in CONCACAF Champions League opener
FC Dallas overcame torrential rain, a sluggish first half, and a hostile crowd to win the first leg of their CCL clashes with Alianza FC of El Salvador. FCD owe goalkeeper Kevin Hartman for keeping them in the match while the rest of the team got acclimated to the action. Hartman made two fantastic saves within the first six minutes. In the 31st minute, Hartman came up big again with a one-on-one save. Neither team maintained much first half possession in the increasingly sloppy conditions.
Whatever FCD manager Schellas Hyndman said at halftime worked as Dallas came out looking much more scrappy and energetic in the second half. They attacked constantly, severely limiting Alianza’s scoring chances. Finally, in the 69th minute, Ricardo Villar lofted a nifty pass in the path of Jackson who nimbly scooted by one defender and slid the ball past the onrushing Alianza keeper. It would be the game’s only goal as Dallas dominated the last twenty minutes with superior speed and endurance. It was a tremendous team effort in difficult conditions, though Hartman (for his saves) and Brek Shea (for his work rate on both ends of the field) were standouts.
The teams will play the return leg at Pizza Hut Park next Wednesday, August 3, with FC Dallas now in pole position to advance to the tournament’s group stage.
What do you think of FC Dallas’ chances in the CONCACAF Champions League?
What’s Shea doing in Central America?
In their 4 – 0 loss to Manchester United last night, the MLS All-Stars were missing one of the most exciting and dangerous scoring threats in MLS this year. FC Dallas fans will know who was missing from the lineup: Brek Shea. To be certain, the 21-year-old forward/midfielder was voted onto the All-Star roster by MLS fans, but he missed the game for international duty of the club variety. Shea is in San Salvador with FC Dallas to kick off their first ever CONCACAF Champions League game against Alianza FC Thursday night. The match will air live on FOX Soccer at 9:00 PM (CT).
Shea is currently tied with Landon Donovan for second most goals scored (9) in MLS this season (Thierry Henry is in first with 11 goals). Shea has quickly established himself as a player to watch. Already a vital starter for FC Dallas, he got his first call-up to the U.S. National Team late last year (friendly against Colombia) and played 60 minutes for the U.S. against Chile in January of this year. With the U.S. team in need of some re-tooling after the Gold Cup, Shea would be a good place to start. If you’ve not seen Shea play, he is tall, physical, fast, and a scoring threat in the air and from distance.
I was surprised to read that Shea spent some time training with Bolton in 2007 – surprised because in thinking I’d like to see him loaned to an EPL club during the next MLS off-season, I thought Bolton might be a good fit. Another American, Stuart Holden, has thrived at Bolton. Shea could possibly earn some decent playing time there, especially if Daniel Sturridge remains at Chelsea (he was loaned to Bolton last season). Stoke, Wigan, or Wolves might be good matches for Shea as well. You heard it here first EPL teams (okay, probably not) – but just in case – do yourselves a favor and give this Brek guy a look. Just don’t get too attached. We want to keep him in Dallas as long as possible!
It’s a big honor for FC Dallas to be in the CONCACAF Champions League, earned by way of being MLS Cup Runners-Up in 2010. I haven’t tuned in to CONCACAF Champions League play in the past, admittedly due to my bias against CONCACAF teams in relation to the quality of UEFA’s Champions League competition. But now that FC Dallas is in the CCL, I am newly motivated to follow the tournament and cheer them on. FC Dallas is good enough to go far. It will be interesting to see how they perform in such a different environment. It won’t be like playing at Pizza Hut Park, that’s for sure. At least they’re already used to the heat. You can hear some of the players’ thoughts about the match here. Check back tomorrow to find out how Shea and FCD fared in their first Champions League adventure.
Should Brek Shea be a regular on the U.S. National Team? Which Premier League team would be a good fit for Shea if he were to go on loan this winter?
Blues roll to another preseason victory
-Chelsea sported their new black away kit for the first time in a match. Looked snazzy overall.
-Chelsea came out looking confident and enthusiastic with a lot of immediate possession. Much more energetic from Chelsea than their previous two Asian games.
-Chelsea didn’t get the ball to Drogba enough in the first fifteen minutes. He wasn’t a threat. Granted, it’s not easy to crack the goal with eight or nine Kitchee defenders cramming the box.
-16th min: Drogba finally found some space and served a great cross from the right to Kalou who connected with his head, but the ball bounced off the ground, then off the crossbar. No goal.
-A primary difference between Drogba and Torres – Drogba usually fights to win back the ball when he loses it. Torres often lets it go.
-Thirty minutes in, Chelsea still looked better than previous games, but for all their possession, still not enough shots on goal to show for their effort.
-Chelsea had plenty of room on the flanks, as they often do, but they’ve got to figure out a way to deal with these defenses packed in the center of the box, because they’ll be facing similar strategy all year against EPL teams.
-36th min: Benayoun made a great cut into the box. One touch too many took away his shooting opportunity, but he was hacked down, and the ref awarded a PK which Lampard put away to make it 1 – 0 for Chelsea.
-43rd min: Great free kick by Drogba from about 35 yards out. Kitchee GK had to make a good save.
2nd Half Highlights/Commentary
-49th min: Great grounder cross from Malouda on the left. Drogba made a good run to tap it in, but didn’t have to as the Kitchee defender knocked it into the net. 2 – 0 for Chelsea.
-60th min: Deflected cross from Malouda was knocked in by an aggressive Drogba header (once again the kind of hustle I’d like to see from Torres). 3 – 0 for Chelsea.
-61st min: Torres, Sturridge, McEachran, Ivanovic, and Mikel entered the game for Drogba, Malouda, Zhirkov, Terry, and Lampard respectively.
-Sturridge was off target with a distance shot and a free kick just a few minutes after entering the game, but it was good to see his hunger and enthusiasm for goal.
-72nd min: Sturridge made a nice leading pass down the right to Fereirra who crossed it right across the goal and past Torres who seemed to jog toward it. For some reason, commentator Martin Tyler immediately came to Torres’ defense, saying “at full throttle – and he [Torres] shouldn’t be expected to be at full throttle at this stage of the preseason – that would’ve been a goal.” I disagree. Why isn’t Torres digging deep to try to win a starting spot? Torres didn’t seem to be expecting the cross. I don’t get it. Drogba would’ve gone all out trying to get the ball in the net. Torres was hesitant and slow and it was entirely typical of his play since joining Chelsea. I’ll try to take a break from Torres-bashing, but I just can’t believe we haven’t seen any change in his effort.
-Rajkovic has potential. He’s a tall, intimidating presence in the back line. He did have a few awkward touches on the ball today, which he probably would’ve paid for in an EPL match. Shortly after one such touch late in the second half, Nathaniel Chalobah replaced him in the game.
-77th min: Sturridge showed tremendous skill in the box, getting by two defenders and rifling in a smart shot from a tough angle on the right side. 4 – 0 for Chelsea.
Sturridge is making a strong case for himself to be a regular starter. At the moment, if there are three starting forward positions open, Drogba and Sturridge deserve 2 of the 3 slots (with Kalou and Malouda neck-in-neck for the 3rd).
-The “Barclay’s Man of the Match” was Yossi Benayoun – a deserved honor for a player who has looked aggressive and hungry throughout the preseason to win a regular starting spot. After struggling with injury last year, it’s good to see him fit and contributing.
-90th min: Torres took a strike from 30 yards out that hit the right post. It was a good idea. Here’s hoping we see more of that assertiveness from him Saturday against Aston Villa.
Who are the top three Chelsea forwards so far this preseason?
The latest and greatest from Camp Blues
It’s been a slow news day ahead of Chelsea’s Wednesday game against Kitchee. In related news, Kitchee is fun to say. According to manager Andre Villas-Boas, we can look forward to seeing a core unit on the field for an hour or so as the team continues honing fitness and cohesion. Players that appeared late in the game against Thai All-Stars will be staying on the longest tomorrow.
Unfortunately for Torres, that means he’ll likely spend most of the game on the bench. I read a good article today exploring why Torres has struggled to shine at Chelsea. I have been tough on Torres since his arrival, but only because I want him to succeed. Plus, it’s confounding (and frustrating) as to where the Liverpool Torres went. That guy was slippery and had a real knack for being in the right place at the right time to score goals. My theory is that he’s never fully recovered from his pre-World Cup ’10 knee injury. A lack of physical confidence has led to the shanks (consult non-soccer movie Tin Cup for shanks info). Anyway, perhaps his lack of form will cause the media to give up and get off his case, thereby allowing him to fully regroup and play to his potential.
Rumors are still dangling about various potential signings, but nothing concrete yet. The most out-of-left-field recent rumor I’ve heard is Chelsea interest in Kaka. I’ll believe that one when I see it. Honestly, I don’t know how Chelsea could possibly fit half the players they’re rumored to be interested in into the lineup unless they cut loose several players (which would be a bad idea).
Speaking of bad ideas – whose was it to give Salomon Kalou a video camera and let him roam the Chelsea cabin during their flight to Hong Kong? Just kidding, Kalou actually avoids too much shaky-cam and gives a humorous behind-the-scenes look at his fellow Blues.
Check back here tomorrow for a rundown of Chelsea v. Kitchee…
Will Torres find his footing in time for the EPL season start? Should Chelsea sign anyone else before the transfer window closes? Should Kalou-Cam be a regular feature on the club’s website?
Villas-Boas defends Blues veterans
I saw a few stories this morning about Sir Alex Ferguson’s jabs at Chelsea, basically saying the Blues haven’t done much to alleviate their ageing problem this summer. Andre Villas-Boas responded by pointing to the squad’s past success and reiterating his belief that they are still strong contenders.
First of all, Fergie is a master of the mind game sound bite (covert trash-talking). Man U’s currently rolling across America, full of confidence, toppling MLS teams left and right. So with the EPL season just a few weeks away, Fergie figures it’s time to launch a strategic barb, aimed at the club he must know will be Man U’s primary title competition next season. With all the talk of Chelsea’s “struggles” last season, it’s easy to forget that they finished a not-too-distant second (and that was with all their supposed geezers in the lineup).
Secondly, Fergie is hardly one to talk about ageing players. Ryan Giggs is still a regular starter for goodness sake. And what about the recently retired Neville and Scholes? I guess they weren’t playing as regularly as Chelsea’s core group of vets, but still. Sir Alex seems to believe in keeping vintage players around and the past few seasons I’ve thought him wise to do so.
Andre Villas-Boas is taking the right approach with the Chelsea roster. People are too quick to write off players over 30. Any other EPL team in their right mind would start Terry, Lampard, or Drogba as often as possible. And those who say Chelsea is just relying on the same old squad haven’t been paying much attention. What about Luiz, Ramires, Mikel, Kalou? And this preseason has shown significant youth promise for the club with McEachran, Bertrand, Van Aanholt, Sturridge, and Chalobah.
Don’t be fooled by Fergie’s mind tricks, Chelsea fans – AVB’s got a strong mix of veterans and youngsters brewing. In the end, I think it will make an exciting, winning combination.
Do you think Chelsea needs more youth in the starting eleven?
Blues look a little better in 4 – 0 win
1st Half Highlights/Commentary
-First 10 minutes were once again sluggish for Chelsea. They were firmly in control of possession, but the build-up was slow, with no real speed in the final third.
-17th min: Some good action from the forwards for a change. First Sturridge sent a floating cross from the left, Torres settled it, tried to move into the box, but cut it back to Anelka who got a shot off at the top of the box, but it was snuffed out.
-Anelka found a lot of space in the first 20 minutes, but his shots and passes weren’t sharp enough.
-32nd min: Best shot of the game so far was by one of the Thai all-stars. Cech had to make a good save.
-34th min: Three Chelsea players (Anelka, Torres, Van Aanholt) touched the ball in the box but couldn’t get a shot on goal!
-37th min: Van Aanholt made a great pass into the box to Torres who made a very poor left-footed shot across the goal that missed wide right.
-37th min: Fortunately for Chelsea, Lampard took one of his classic worm-burner shots from the top of the box to score (Anelka set up Lampard with a short pass).
-First half negatives: Corner kick finishing was dreadful. Chelsea did not seem interested in connecting via headers or otherwise. The corners were simply wasted.
Torres and Sturridge found some decent openings, but their finishing shots were sorely lacking. Don’t mean to pick on Torres too much, but when is he going to get it in gear? He is not a threat to opposing defenses at all. He is slow, sloppy, seems to give up easily on the ball, and his shots are either too soft or not even on frame.
-First half positives: McEachran had excellent ball control and impeccable passing. The Chelsea defense handled the few Thai challenges with poise. Anelka was more involved with the action than he was against Malaysia XI. Van Aanholt continuously made contributing runs down the left flank, working several connecting passes into the box.
2nd Half Highlights/Commentary
-The only change for Chelsea to start the second half was Hilario taking over for Cech in goal.
-49th min: Bosingwa sent in a cross that looked disappointing because it was too close to goal, but the Thai GK appeared to misjudge the ball’s flight and knocked it into the goal… 2 – 0 for Chelsea.
-51st min: Great sequence from Ivanovic starting the ball forward from the back, played a give-and-go to McEachran, then Ivanovic found himself one v. one with the GK and slid it in to make it 3 – 0 for Chelsea.
-61st min: Drogba, Malouda, Benayoun, Ferreira, Zhirkov, Cole, Kalou, and Rajkovic entered the game.
-72nd min: Malouda ran onto an excellent through-ball from Cole and Malouda scored to make it 4-0.
-76th min: Jamal Blackman took over for Hilario in goal. Chalobah replaced Ivanovic.
-Second half negatives: Chelsea’s possession was more sporadic than in the first half. The defense was a little leaky, allowing several dangerous Thai shots.
-Second half positives: Though the Chelsea attack wasn’t particularly cohesive, they were much better at finding openings and finishing in the final third. Villas-Boas talked about wanting to see more “vertical” passing after the Malaysia game and Chelsea finally achieved more successful vertical balls today.
Also, Hilario was fantastic in goal. I have not been impressed in the past by Hilario’s play (in the very few appearances he’s made), but he looked world class today.
Summary: It was great to see so many goals, however, the score doesn’t actually reflect much Chelsea improvement over the Malaysia game. There was still a painful lack of urgency from the Blues in the first half and a very casual pace in the second. However, Chelsea was much better at creating space and scoring opportunities than in their last outing. Hopefully, the team will continue looking sharper as they move camp to Hong Kong.
Do you think Chelsea played better today than against Malaysia XI?
1-0 Chelsea win leaves much to be desired from Blues
1st Half Highlights (or lowlights)/Commentary
-Good to see Bertrand and McEachran in the starting eleven.
-Chelsea played a 4-3-3 formation as preferred by Andre Villas-Boas at Porto.
-I’m unfamiliar with Slobodan Rajkovic in the back line (22-year-old). Apparently he has European work permit issues so he’s getting a look during the Asia tour.
-2nd min: Benayoun took a giveaway and gave great through-ball to Torres who slid a grounder right to the goalie. Torres should’ve finished the golden opportunity.
-First third of the game was very sluggish possession-wise for Chelsea. 67 passes in first 12 minutes or so, but in small spurts, often broken up, with very little flow and only a couple chances from Benayoun passes.
-I’d like to see a little more aggressiveness and snap. Manchester United and Real Madrid look sharper and hungrier for goals in their recent U.S. friendlies.
-17th min: Bertrand hit cross from left that was mis-cleared, Kalou tapped it to Lampard who missed the goal badly.
-19th min: Excellent through-ball from Kalou to Torres who couldn’t toe it in from a tough angle.
-Through first 20 minutes, Chelsea defense looked very calm and composed. No real threats from Malaysia XI.
-Some impressive work from Bertrand passing and dribbling down left side.
-29th min: Lampard free kick right on edge of box, but he smashed it off Malouda and out of play.
-Torres was static off the ball for much of the half. Not encouraging.
-Chelsea looked pretty sloppy in the final third, which was a problem for much of last season.
-36th min: Bosingwa threw an unusual mini-tantrum, throwing the ball away when he disagreed with a throw-in call. A few minutes later Kalou protested when he was called for a clear hand-ball. Both cases showed poor sportsmanship/professionalism from Chelsea, particularly for a friendly! They should know better.
-37th min: Patrick Van Aanholt replaced Bertrand at left back. Not sure if it was planned, or if Bertrand was gassed. Surprising move because Bertrand looked strong and confident.
-39th min: Torres made one good move past a defender inside the left side of the box to get a shot off, but once again from a bad angle.
-With 40 minutes gone, one of the game commentators remarked that, “…preseason or not, [he is] exceptionally underwhelmed by Chelsea. No real movement. No real desire.” I couldn’t have agreed with him more!
-42nd min: Lampard missed another chance in the box, right in front of goal, after a quick succession of nice passes (though he looked to be barely offside anyway).
-45th min: Great cross from Bosingwa but Torres barely missed getting his head on it and Benayoun’s resulting clean-up shot was blocked by a defender.
Summary: While you can’t read too much into preseason matches, this was a very disappointing start from Chelsea. You would expect that competition for playing spots would inspire more aggressiveness and spark from players trying to impress the manager. Alas, there was very little energy or zip from the squad in the first half with the exceptions of Benayoun and Bertrand.
-An entirely new eleven started the second half.
-47th min: Mikel made the kind of quality long-range shot that was missing in the first half.
-First 10 minutes of the second half Chelsea showed a bit more desire, but not many scoring chances to show for it.
-60th min: Good initiative by Terry, taking a ball at midfield and rushing it forward. Nice leading pass to Anelka who passed it back toward the middle, but a defender cleared it out.
-20 minutes into the second half I was getting restless. It seemed every Chelsea pass was just out of reach, or intercepted, or headed away. Far too many long balls. Little build-up passing. The initial hope brought on by the second half eleven began to fade.
-69th min: Zhirkov free kick found Terry’s head but it went a couple feet over the crossbar. At least Terry was showing some leadership with his aggressiveness.
-70th min: Sturridge ran onto a ball, took it into the box and hit a nice low shot, but the GK made a great save.
-As usual, Drogba worked much harder off the ball than Torres. He makes things happen. He’s a troublemaker for defenses. Hopefully Torres will learn from Drogba’s wily ways!
-78th min: Drogba free kick outside left side of the box was a screamer that the goalkeeper barely got a hand on. The ball bounced off the post, off the GK’s back, bounced on the line, and was ruled a goal by the linesman. Replays clearly showed the ball did not cross the line.
-85th min: Malaysia missed an easy goal after an unusual lapse in the middle of the Chelsea defense.
-Billy Clifford (midfielder), Mikel, and Anelka were invisible for the last 20 minutes. Not good.
Summary: With the Blues players only having to play one half, we should have seen much more hustle and desire. Yes it’s only preseason, but Malaysia is a team that lost to Liverpool 6-3 just last week. That’s the kind of dominating result you want to encourage and reward a team for training hard in preseason. You want to blaze through these tune-up games, build confidence, and peak in time for the EPL season premier against Stoke.
Overall, absolutely not the energetic, goal-blitz I was looking for from Chelsea. It was a lackadaisical effort that brought back bad memories of last season. Andre Villas-Boas couldn’t have been impressed. Hopefully he’ll light a fire under the team before the next match in Thailand on Sunday!
How do you think Chelsea played today?
Grading the new Chelsea manager’s first month on the job
Okay, so it’s not really fair to grade a coach after barely a month at a new job. Especially since there haven’t even been any regular season games yet. But I’ve got to blog about something while I wait out the remaining twelve hours or so before Chelsea kicks off against Malaysia XI, so it might as well be evaluating AVB!
I liked Carlo Ancelotti. I thought the club treated him poorly and sacked him prematurely. So whoever succeeded him would have to win me over as a fan. So far, AVB has done just that. He has brought new energy to the club, seems to have a good plan in place, and has hit the ground running to implement it (not that he had much choice, with little prep time before the players returned). As a detail-oriented guy, I can appreciate his apparent detail-orientedness. For example, check out this snooping from the Daily Mail, which shows some of AVB’s clipboard diagrams from a recent training session.
I also appreciate the way AVB has tempered the hoopla surrounding his Porto success and megabucks transfer to Chelsea with appropriate humility. He fully realizes that his Porto trophies got him to Chelsea, but staying past one season in London will require fast results. Fair or not, that is the scenario. But AVB seems up to the challenge.
AVB has also made smart personnel decisions, like promoting Steve Holland and Michael Emenalo (to assistant first team coach and technical director respectively), and choosing recent West Brom manager Roberto Di Matteo as his assistant coach. Di Matteo was a pleasant surprise of a choice. My impression of him last year prior to his West Brom canning was that he is an intelligent, mature guy with a lot of managerial potential. Player-wise, AVB has taken a careful approach, not getting sucked into the transfer market madness, or trying to flex too much managerial muscle with sweeping changes.
Ancelotti was a good manager, but perhaps his laidback style lulled the largely veteran team to sleep for much of last season. There is a renewed energy about the team since Villas-Boas’ arrival. Sometimes, even when the previous coach is well liked, teams need a leadership change to recharge the batteries. So far, the team is reacting well to AVB’s training. The players are fired up for the new season. They don’t seem put off by AVB’s youthfulness either. In fact, John Terry’s apparently been inspired by AVB to become a Chelsea manager himself someday.
Here’s hoping Chelsea’s perceived reinvigoration translates into some dynamic soccer in Malaysia tomorrow!
What do you think – how is Andre Villas-Boas doing so far?